Printable Format

Previous | Next

Source or prior law:

L. 1862, ch. 46, art. 2, § 1; L. 1867, ch. 70, § 1; G.S. 1868, ch. 18, § 15; L. 1869, ch. 24, § 1; L. 1870, ch. 47, § 1; L. 1874, ch. 46, § 13; L. 1879, ch. 82, § 2; L. 1881, ch. 37, § 11; L. 1883, ch. 34, § 1; L. 1887, ch. 99, § 3; for later law repealed by R.S. 1923, see L. 1907, ch. 114, § 27.

Revisor's Note:

Reasons for repeal, see preamble to L. 1965, ch. 90.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. City has implied power to pass ordinance changing name of streets. Brown v. City of Topeka, 146 Kan. 974, 978, 74 P.2d 142.

2. Ordinance prohibiting gambling devices held valid. Clemons v. Wilson, 151 Kan. 250, 252, 98 P.2d 423.

3. Cited in upholding city ordinance levying inspection fee against milk producers. Dorssom v. City of Atchison, 155 Kan. 225, 228, 229, 124 P.2d 475.

4. City ordinance requiring tuberculin test of milk producer's herd upheld. Dorssom v. City of Atchison, 155 Kan. 225, 229, 124 P.2d 475.

5. Discussed in applying R.S. 1923, 13-443, to case pertaining to vacated alley; reversion. Luttgen v. Ergenbright, 161 Kan. 183, 187, 166 P.2d 712.

6. City may repeal ordinance licensing theaters. Stovall v. City of Topeka, 166 Kan. 35, 37, 199 P.2d 516.

7. Parking meter ordinance enacted primarily to regulate traffic held valid. City of Hutchinson v. Harrison, 173 Kan. 18, 22, 244 P.2d 222.

8. Cited; drainage system construction held exercise of city's governmental functions. Perry v. City of Wichita, 174 Kan. 264, 270, 255 P.2d 667.

9. Section mentioned; city may reduce paved width of street; remedy is damages not injunction. Gorrill v. City of Lawrence, 196 Kan. 303, 306, 411 P.2d 704.