Printable Format13-422.
History: L. 1903, ch. 122, § 42; R.S. 1923, § 13-422; Repealed, L. 1963, ch. 90, § 1; June 30.
Source or prior law:
L. 1862, ch. 46, art. 2, § 1, ¶ 15; L. 1864, ch. 69, § 2, ¶ 14; L. 1867, ch. 70, § 1, ¶ 14; G.S. 1868, ch. 18, § 15, ¶ 15; G.S. 1868, ch. 18, § 55; L. 1869, ch. 24, § 1, ¶ 23; L. 1870, ch. 47, § 1, ¶ 26; L. 1874, ch. 46, § 13, ¶ 22; L. 1879, ch. 82, § 2, ¶ 27; L. 1881, ch. 37, § 11, ¶ 36; L. 1883, ch. 34, § 1, ¶ 36; L. 1887, ch. 99, § 3, ¶ 36; for later law repealed by R.S. 1923, see L. 1907, ch. 114, § 48.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Section considered in proceedings to oust mayor of city. The State, ex rel., v. Wilson, 30 Kan. 661, 668, 2 P. 828.
2. Policeman holds an "office" within meaning of constitution. Haney v. Cofran, 94 Kan. 332, 333, 146 P. 1027. Modified: Haney v. Cofran, 95 Kan. 335, 148 P. 640.
3. Policeman holds office during pleasure of authority making appointment. Haney v. Cofran, 94 Kan. 332, 336, 146 P. 1027. Overruled in part: Haney v. Cofran, 95 Kan. 335, 148 P. 640.
4. Term of police officers should be definitely fixed by ordinance. Haney v. Cofran, 95 Kan. 335, 148 P. 640.
5. Policeman not within civil-service law; not subject to regulations. Haney v. Cofran, 94 Kan. 332, 338, 146 P. 1027. Modified: Haney v. Cofran, 95 Kan. 335, 148 P. 640.