Printable Format13-424.
History: L. 1903, ch. 122, § 44; R.S. 1923, § 13-424; L. 1951, ch. 139, § 2; Repealed, L. 1973, ch. 61, § 12-4702; April 1, 1974.
Source or prior law:
L. 1862, ch. 46, art. 2, § 1, ¶ 16; L. 1864, ch. 69, § 2, ¶ 15; L. 1867, ch. 70, § 1, ¶ 15; G.S. 1868, ch. 18, § 15, ¶ 16; L. 1869, ch. 24, § 1, ¶ 24; L. 1870, ch. 47, § 1, ¶ 27; L. 1874, ch. 46, § 13, ¶ 23; L. 1879, ch. 82, § 2, ¶ 28; L. 1881, ch. 37, § 11, ¶ 37; L. 1883, ch. 34, § 1, ¶ 37; L. 1887, ch. 99, § 3, ¶ 37; for later law repealed by R.S. 1923, see L. 1907, ch. 114, § 50.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Section considered in upholding ordinance prohibiting sale of intoxicating liquor. City of Topeka v. Myers, 34 Kan. 500, 501, 8 P. 726. Overruled: State v. Peterson, 102 Kan. 900, 171 P. 1153.
2. Ordinance prescribing no penalty is nullity in criminal proceedings. City of Coffeyville v. Vakas, 137 Kan. 797, 799, 22 P.2d 428.
3. Ordinance prohibiting gambling devices held valid. Clemons v. Wilson, 151 Kan. 250, 252, 98 P.2d 423.
4. Cited; jury trial not demandable on appeal from police court conviction. City of Fort Scott v. Arbuckle, 165 Kan. 374, 387, 196 P.2d 217.