Printable Format

Previous | Next

Cross References to Related Sections:

Later act, see 12-2001, 12-2002.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Power of city in contracting with public utility considered. The State, ex rel., v. Gas Co., 88 Kan. 165, 172, 127 P. 639. Affirmed: Wyandotte Gas Co. v. Kansas, 231 U.S. 622, 34 S. Ct. 226, 58 L. Ed. 404.

2. Scope of jurisdiction of public utilities commission defined. The State, ex rel., v. Gas Co., 88 Kan. 165, 171, 127 P. 639. Affirmed: Wyandotte Gas Co. v. Kansas, 231 U.S. 622, 34 S. Ct. 226, 58 L. Ed. 404.

3. City cannot, by contract, divest itself of duty concerning rates. The State, ex rel., v. Gas Co., 88 Kan. 165, 172, 127 P. 639. Affirmed: Wyandotte Gas Co. v. Kansas, 231 U.S. 622, 34 S. Ct. 226, 58 L. Ed. 404.

4. Utility having complied with ordinance, new conditions cannot be imposed. City of Wichita v. Railroad & Light Co., 96 Kan. 606, 152 P. 768.

5. Provisions of franchise not affected by statute enacted later. City of Wichita v. Railroad & Light Co., 96 Kan. 606, 152 P. 768.

6. Submission of books and records to inspection, when not required. City of Wichita v. Railroad & Light Co., 96 Kan. 606, 152 P. 768.