Printable Format13-2201.
History: L. 1909, ch. 74, § 4; R.S. 1923, § 13-2201; L. 1977, ch. 105, § 2; Repealed, L. 1998, ch. 2, § 1; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Operation of this statute not limited by "soldiers' preference law." Goodrich v. O'Neill, 85 Kan. 595, 596, 117 P. 1016.
2. Field man in health department subject to civil-service regulations. Jagger v. Green, 90 Kan. 153, 155, 133 P. 174.
3. Employment of field man does not terminate with appointing board. Jagger v. Green, 90 Kan. 153, 159, 133 P. 174.
4. Policeman not within provisions of civil-service law. Haney v. Cofran, 94 Kan. 332, 337, 146 P. 1027. Modified: 95 Kan. 335, 148 P. 640.
5. Policeman holds office during pleasure of authority making appointment. Haney v. Cofran, 94 Kan. 332, 338, 146 P. 1027. Overruled in part: Haney v. Cofran, 95 Kan. 335, 336, 148 P. 640.
6. Terms of police officers should be definitely fixed by ordinance. Haney v. Cofran, 95 Kan. 335, 337, 148 P. 640.
7. Act need not apply to all classes of cities alike. The State, ex rel., v. City of Wichita, 100 Kan. 399, 406, 164 P. 290.
8. City of Wichita not subject to any civil service rules or regulations. Piper v. City of Wichita, 174 Kan. 590, 597, 600, 258 P.2d 253.
9. Wichita fire department not subject to act. Piper v. City of Wichita, 174 Kan. 590, 597, 600, 258 P.2d 253.