Printable Format13-2602.
History: L. 1907, ch. 114, § 113; R.S. 1923, § 13-2602; Repealed, L. 1951, ch. 131, § 1; June 30.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Section cited in considering purpose and use of reserve fund. Railway Co. v. City of Topeka, 95 Kan. 747, 750, 149 P. 697.
2. Restrictions relate only to matters within discretion of city officers. The State, ex rel., v. Bentley, 98 Kan. 442, 443, 157 P. 1197.
3. Legislature may impose obligations over which officers have no discretion. The State, ex rel., v. Bentley, 98 Kan. 442, 443, 157 P. 1197.
4. Expenditure for municipal light plant cannot exceed funds on hand. The State, ex rel., v. City of Coffeyville, 111 Kan. 803, 208 P. 571.
5. Warrants cannot be drawn in excess of funds on hand. The State, ex rel., v. City of Coffeyville, 111 Kan. 803, 208 P. 571.
6. Officers creating city court causing deficit not guilty of misfeasance. State, ex rel., v. Hettinger, 134 Kan. 405, 408, 5 P.2d 862.
7. Inapplicable to project to be financed by bond issue. Cow Creek Valley Flood Prevention Ass'n v. City of Hutchinson, 166 Kan. 78, 82, 200 P.2d 299.