Printable Format19-2912.
History: L. 1939, ch. 165, § 12; Repealed, L. 1991, ch. 56, § 28; January 1, 1992.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Court must determine in a de novo hearing whether a non-conforming use has been abandoned. Union Quarries, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners, 206 Kan. 268, 274, 275, 478 P.2d 181.
2. Error to impose fines for continuing violations not yet committed nor convicted of; sentencing must include consideration of K.S.A. 21-4607(3) and Kansas Constitution, Bill of Rights, § 9. State v. Scherer, 11 Kan. App. 2d 362, 369, 370, 721 P.2d 743 (1986).
3. Noted in holding that imposition of fine beyond minimum mandatory amount stated in K.S.A. 8-1567 requires compliance with K.S.A. 21-4607. State v. Shuster, 17 Kan. App. 2d 8, 9, 829 P.2d 925 (1992).