Printable Format21-4018.
History: L. 1998, ch. 179, § 1; L. 2000, ch. 181, § 8; L. 2005, ch. 131, § 2; L. 2006, ch. 149, § 6; L. 2010, ch. 88, § 2; Repealed, L. 2011, ch. 30, § 288; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Acquittal of identity theft affirmed where unauthorized immigrant bought false identification papers in order to work in U.S. City of Liberal v. Vargas, 28 Kan. App. 2d 867, 24 P.3d 155 (2001).
2. Sufficient evidence defendant obtained identifying information to defraud for economic benefit. State v. Oswald, 36 Kan. App. 2d 144, 150, 137 P.3d 1066 (2006).
3. Conviction hereunder; identity theft not considered a single act but a continuing course of criminal conduct. State v. Meza, 38 Kan. App. 2d 245, 250, 251, 165 P.3d 298 (2007).
4. An offense is committed when every statutory element occurs. State v. Green, 38 Kan. App. 2d 781, 785, 786, 172 P.3d 1213 (2007).
5. Cited; K.S.A. 21-4018 does not require economic loss to victim, only proof of intent to defraud. State v. Johnson, 40 Kan. App. 2d 196, 203, 204, 190 P.3d 995 (2008).
6. K.S.A. 21-4018 construed; deceased person's identity included within identity theft statute. State v. Hardesty, 42 Kan. App. 2d 431, 213 P.3d 745 (2009).