Printable Format59-3009.
History: L. 1965, ch. 347, § 9; L. 1967, ch. 320, § 1; L. 1976, ch. 242, § 90; L. 1983, ch. 191, § 6; L. 1986, ch. 213, § 2; L. 1994, ch. 243, § 1; L. 1996, ch. 77, § 1; L. 2000, ch. 171, § 77; Repealed, L. 2002, ch. 114, § 81; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Premature appeal from order to amend petition in conformity with this section. In re Austin, 200 Kan. 92, 93, 435 P.2d 1.
2. Ward's presence within state confers subject matter jurisdiction. In re Miller, 228 Kan. 606, 607, 608, 610, 611, 620 P.2d 800.
3. Attorney fees allowed where guardianship petition filed at request of proposed ward. In re Miller, 5 Kan. App. 2d 246, 249, 251, 252, 257, 616 P.2d 287.
4. Kansas has jurisdiction to appoint guardian for person within state even though foreign jurisdiction previously exercised jurisdiction; question of comity. In re Miller, 5 Kan. App. 2d 246, 249, 251, 252, 257, 616 P.2d 287.
5. Mentioned concerning appointment of conservator. In re Conservatorship of Hatfield, 231 Kan. 427, 646 P.2d 481 (1982).
6. Jurisdiction determined in action for selection of guardian and conservator of minor. In re Stremel, 233 Kan. 136, 138, 141, 143, 660 P.2d 952 (1983).
7. Distinctions in venue between guardianship proceedings and conservatorship proceedings examined. Venue in combined proceedings noted. In re Guardianship of K.M.W., 13 Kan. App. 2d 640, 643, 777 P.2d 1274 (1989).
8. Noted in holding provisions in K.S.A. 59-3010 mandatory not directory thus requiring compliance for jurisdiction regarding guardianship/conservatorship. In re Guardianship and Conservatorship of Fogle, 17 Kan. App. 2d 357, 361, 837 P.2d 842 (1992).
9. Death of conservatee does not immediately divest district court of subject matter jurisdiction in conservatorship proceeding. In re Guardianship & Conservatorship of Heck, 22 Kan. App. 2d 135, 140, 913 P.2d 213 (1996).